Employee messages to his attorney sent over the employer’s e-mail system, a practice against company policy, are not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine under New York state law. In denying the employee’s motion for a protective order, the court in Scott v. Beth Israel Medical Center (“BIMC”) precluded the employer from viewing Scott’s e-mails to his attorney from his BIMC account. In finding that the employee waived privilege, the court concluded that BIMC had an e-mail policy banning personal use and that Scott had constructive notice that BIMC had the right to monitor e-mail communications over its network. The court also rejected Scott’s work product doctrine argument based upon his attorney’s confidentiality notice e-mail footer, holding that the attorney’s confidentiality notice at the end of e-mails was “insufficient and not a reasonable precaution” to create a qualified privilege against disclosure.
Filed under: e-Discovery | Tagged: Attorney-client privilege, compliance, email, expectation of privacy, privilege waiver, records management policy, Rule 502, work product doctrine |
We’re blogging on this too. Check our site to see a Canadian perspective.