By Christine Taylor, January 9, 2008, 12:10 PM
A few years ago, the Taneja Group coined the term “Information Classification and Management” (ICM) to describe the technology of locating and classifying data throughout the enterprise. ICM covered sub-technology sectors such as e-discovery, compliance, data security control, and data management. However, we saw the term “e-discovery” trump the more comprehensive name as rabid attention turned from ICM to the specifics of civil litigation software tools. We are now seeing the e-discovery term itself take on a fuller usage, more akin to ICM. People do use the term when talking about civil litigation, but are also expanding it to encompass compliance, corporate governance, data classification, and even knowledge management.
In this broad sense we have looked at the trends of the e-discovery market as they impact its largest stakeholders: the enterprise general counsel and compliance officers, law firms serving corporate clients, and IT.
The crux of the matter is that e-discovery and its related areas will be extremely hot for litigation and compliance, especially those related to the financial meltdown. The market increasingly understands the necessity of e-discovery software tools and systems, and will move toward proactive e-discovery adoption. A more reactive approach will remain alive and well as many companies will still avoid implementation until driven to it by a lawsuit or federal investigation. But companies will increasingly understand that the e-discovery solution phenomenon is much more than a litigation aid. It also has major effects on federal compliance and internal governance, and potentially on data management throughout the enterprise.
For more see byteandswitch.com.
Filed under: Attorney-client privilege, audit standards, Business Technology, chief legal officers, CIO, e-Discovery, ECM, email, enterprise content management, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Evidence, in-house counsel, internal investigations, IT, Legal Technology, Litigation management, Records Management Policies, Regulatory Compliance, Rule 502, subpoenas, White Collar Crime | Tagged: Corporate compliance, Corporate governance, Data Privacy and Security, data security, e-Discovery, email, enterprise content management, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Evidence, general counsel, in-house counsel, inadvertent waiver, Law department management, litigation, Litigation management, records management policy, Regulatory Compliance, Rule 502, Sarbanes-Oxley, White Collar Crime | Leave a comment »