<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Datakos Blawg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Rick Wolf's two cents on corporate governance, compliance, records management, and legal services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
			<item>
		<title>Whither Cloud Computing?</title>
		<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/whither-cloud-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/whither-cloud-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Privacy and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’ve heard of cloud computing and all the security issues that surround it, and if you’re wondering if you should trust the security of your sensitive and confidential data to a third party service provider, well, all I can say is that you’re like the old timer who hoards his wad of cash in [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=wolfs2cents.wordpress.com&blog=574495&post=520&subd=wolfs2cents&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/whither-cloud-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9e3223a402c7a85c4244b57e0decf8e6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wolfs2cents</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting Privilege &#8212; New Rule 502 mitigates the risk of inadvertent e-discovery disclosures</title>
		<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/protecting-privilege-new-rule-502-mitigates-the-risk-of-inadvertent-e-discovery-disclosures/</link>
		<comments>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/protecting-privilege-new-rule-502-mitigates-the-risk-of-inadvertent-e-discovery-disclosures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney-client privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Rules of Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law department management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records Management Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 502]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise content management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpoenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Privacy and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inadvertent waiver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/?p=514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Michael Kozubek
Published in the 2/1/2009 Issue of Inside Counsel.
Privilege review has been a major culprit in the skyrocketing cost of e-discovery. With hundreds of thousands of documents subject to discovery in numerous cases, attorney-client communications and work-product information frequently end up in the hands of the opposing party. Because the production of privileged documents during [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=wolfs2cents.wordpress.com&blog=574495&post=514&subd=wolfs2cents&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/protecting-privilege-new-rule-502-mitigates-the-risk-of-inadvertent-e-discovery-disclosures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9e3223a402c7a85c4244b57e0decf8e6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wolfs2cents</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CVS Pays $2.25 Million and Toughens Practices to Settle HIPAA Privacy Case</title>
		<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/cvs-pays-225-million-and-toughens-practices-to-settle-hipaa-privacy-case/</link>
		<comments>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/cvs-pays-225-million-and-toughens-practices-to-settle-hipaa-privacy-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records Management Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpoenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Privacy and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records Management Policy Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records retention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/?p=510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Federal Trade Commission today announced that CVS, the nation&#8217;s largest retail pharmacy chain, will pay the U.S. government a $2.25 million settlement and take corrective action to ensure it does not violate the privacy of its millions of patients when disposing of patient information such [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=wolfs2cents.wordpress.com&blog=574495&post=510&subd=wolfs2cents&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/cvs-pays-225-million-and-toughens-practices-to-settle-hipaa-privacy-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9e3223a402c7a85c4244b57e0decf8e6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wolfs2cents</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds Set Sights on &#8216;Gatekeepers&#8217; in Fraud Investigations</title>
		<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/feds-set-sights-on-gatekeepers-in-fraud-investigations/</link>
		<comments>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/feds-set-sights-on-gatekeepers-in-fraud-investigations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Collar Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief legal officers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-house counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney-client privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general counsel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Palazzolo
Legal Times
Federal law enforcement officials said Wednesday they are targeting lawyers, mortgage brokers, real estate brokers and other &#8220;gatekeepers&#8221; who perpetrated fraud that contributed to the current economic crisis &#8212; a clear warning shot as the federal government is pumping billions of dollars into the financial sector.
&#8220;They have the most to lose, they&#8217;re the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=wolfs2cents.wordpress.com&blog=574495&post=508&subd=wolfs2cents&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/feds-set-sights-on-gatekeepers-in-fraud-investigations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9e3223a402c7a85c4244b57e0decf8e6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wolfs2cents</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tough Times for Corporate Legal Departments</title>
		<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/tough-times-for-corporate-legal-departments/</link>
		<comments>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/tough-times-for-corporate-legal-departments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law department management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief legal officers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-house counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Lexakos asked law department leaders again about their concerns, priorities and resource allocation plans for 2009. This year&#8217;s benchmarking survey covers reporting metrics, outsource planning for IP and litigation, budget pressures, e-discovery, privilege waiver management in relation to new Federal Evidence Rule 502, and other compliance priorities.

In 2007 and 2008, Compliance Week, the leading publication and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=wolfs2cents.wordpress.com&blog=574495&post=503&subd=wolfs2cents&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/tough-times-for-corporate-legal-departments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9e3223a402c7a85c4244b57e0decf8e6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wolfs2cents</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Data Breach, Privacy Bills in Congress</title>
		<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/new-data-breach-privacy-bills-in-congress/</link>
		<comments>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/new-data-breach-privacy-bills-in-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill S. 139]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Privacy and Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Adhikari
One year after trying unsuccessfully to introduce legislation on data breaches and protection of individual privacy, California Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) is trying again.
This week, she introduced Bills S.139, the Notification of Risk to Personal Data Act and S.141, the Social Security Number Misuse Prevention Act.
Bill S.139 would require federal agencies or businesses to [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=wolfs2cents.wordpress.com&blog=574495&post=500&subd=wolfs2cents&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/new-data-breach-privacy-bills-in-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9e3223a402c7a85c4244b57e0decf8e6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wolfs2cents</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kill the Billable Hour? A British Response</title>
		<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/kill-the-billable-hour-a-british-response/</link>
		<comments>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/kill-the-billable-hour-a-british-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Client Relationship Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law department management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general counsel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as the legal sector experiences a change in momentum, such a change seems to be occurring now.
Last week, The Am Law Daily picked up on a piece penned by Cravath, Swaine &#38; Moore&#8217;s Evan Chesler in the latest issue of Forbes magazine, entitled &#8220;Time to Kill the Billable Hour.&#8221; Cravath&#8217;s presiding partner, in [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=wolfs2cents.wordpress.com&blog=574495&post=497&subd=wolfs2cents&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/kill-the-billable-hour-a-british-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9e3223a402c7a85c4244b57e0decf8e6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wolfs2cents</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Mark to Market Rule for Lawsuits?</title>
		<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/a-mark-to-market-rule-for-lawsuits/</link>
		<comments>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/a-mark-to-market-rule-for-lawsuits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney-client privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief legal officers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-house counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outside auditors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outside auditor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/?p=493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has proposed a new standard for public disclosure of pending lawsuits. This raises interesting legal technology and management questions for general counsels.
Reporting Rights in the January 2009 issue of InsideCounsel reports on FASB Statements No. 5 and 141[R].   These now-delayed rules would lower
“the threshold for reporting the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=wolfs2cents.wordpress.com&blog=574495&post=493&subd=wolfs2cents&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/a-mark-to-market-rule-for-lawsuits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9e3223a402c7a85c4244b57e0decf8e6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wolfs2cents</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-Discovery Trends in 2009 &#8212; New developments in e-discovery will affect enterprise general counsel and compliance officers, law firms serving corporate clients, and IT departments</title>
		<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/e-discovery-trends-in-2009-new-developments-in-e-discovery-will-affect-enterprise-general-counsel-and-compliance-officers-law-firms-serving-corporate-clients-and-it-departments/</link>
		<comments>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/e-discovery-trends-in-2009-new-developments-in-e-discovery-will-affect-enterprise-general-counsel-and-compliance-officers-law-firms-serving-corporate-clients-and-it-departments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney-client privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Rules of Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Rules of Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records Management Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 502]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Collar Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief legal officers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise content management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-house counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpoenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Privacy and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inadvertent waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law department management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records management policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarbanes-Oxley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Christine Taylor, January 9, 2008, 12:10 PM
A few years ago, the Taneja Group coined the term &#8220;Information Classification and Management&#8221; (ICM) to describe the technology of locating and classifying data throughout the enterprise. ICM covered sub-technology sectors such as e-discovery, compliance, data security control, and data management. However, we saw the term &#8220;e-discovery&#8221; trump [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=wolfs2cents.wordpress.com&blog=574495&post=489&subd=wolfs2cents&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/e-discovery-trends-in-2009-new-developments-in-e-discovery-will-affect-enterprise-general-counsel-and-compliance-officers-law-firms-serving-corporate-clients-and-it-departments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9e3223a402c7a85c4244b57e0decf8e6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wolfs2cents</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-Discovery Requirements Are About to Hit Canadian Firms</title>
		<link>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/e-discovery-requirements-are-about-to-hit-canadian-firms/</link>
		<comments>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/e-discovery-requirements-are-about-to-hit-canadian-firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records Management Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise content management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Privacy and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records Management Policy Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Canadian firms brace for new e-discovery rules, they can look to their U.S. counterparts for technology lessons.
By  Anne Rawland Gabriel
Time is growing short for Canadian securities firms to prepare for the scheduled April enforcement of the new Canadian National Instrument 31-103 (NI 31-103), regulation that significantly expands record keeping requirements for electronic communications. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=wolfs2cents.wordpress.com&blog=574495&post=476&subd=wolfs2cents&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfs2cents.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/e-discovery-requirements-are-about-to-hit-canadian-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9e3223a402c7a85c4244b57e0decf8e6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wolfs2cents</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>